The Abstract of the Article "Ontology of the Human Being and the Parasitic Way of Thinking"
The work also indicates the idea of Max Scheler "On the Establishment of the Holistic Concept of Human Being", as "accumulated disparate material", which is denoted as integrity "anthropological knowledge" or so-called "cognitive anthropology". In fact, the concept of Scheler is in tune with the ideas of P. S. Gurevich, expressed in his publication "The Integrity Problem of Human Being" [1, p. 22], which states that "integrity is the idea of a universal interconnected process of learning" as a whole, which for the philosopher is "intuitively more important part".
A fascinating idea "the whole is greater than its parts" does not allow many scientists to consider the essence of human being, as so as "the object of learning exhausts itself in the particulars". Thus, the idea of the whole and the integrity is merged the thinker in the idealistic impulse, closing the knowable to knowledge.
In my article “A Unified Mobius the Essence and Integrity” I have given the criteria to separate the two classes of phenomena: “a holistic and not holistic”.
So, integrity has a unique nature: when dividing it is multiplied and when the multiplication is divided, while remaining indivisible. It is empirically proven that the integrity inherent resistance to deformation. Therefore, it is indivisible and eternal. The whole doesn't have such perculiarity. On the contrary, when it is subject to division asymmetry and the formation of parts, which “inevitably makes it unstable to deformation” [2, p. 1705]. “The ruggedness” of a human being can mean only one thing – his or her untimely death. So, most scientists have to get away from
“the substance of the issue”. The criterion of the integrity indivisibility gives the opportunity to solve the problem of human integrity and the human psyche as a phenomenon. After all, integrity is not an abstraction, but a living unique human organism, endowed with psyche and mind with its strong pace in this world.